Urgent help needed:
creation.com are running a program discrediting Evolution by asking questions they think we cannot answer fully. Find the chink in their armour. Sock it to them, politely!
Then answer as scientifically as you can, and politely to impress them with how nice we are, and add your bit to demolish their campain. You may need to do some research first, but that helps you to understand your position.
If you are at school or Uni perhaps you can do it as a project with others. Possibly your teacher/lecturer may have some references that could help you for the particular point you want to support. Join the fight and do your part.

From creation.com web page:

15 Questions summary Note to would-be evolution defenders: please read the full brochure and linked articles before attempting to answer the questions, otherwise you will likely be wasting your time boxing at shadows.

Go to: http://creation.com/15-questions for the full text of the questions.

1. How did life with specifications for hundreds of proteins originate just by chemistry without intelligent design?
2. How did the DNA code originate?
3. How could copying errors (mutations) create 3 billion letters of DNA instructions to change a microbe into a microbiologist?
4. Why is natural selection taught as ‘evolution’ as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life?
5. How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate?
6. Living things look like they were designed, so how do evolutionists know that they were not designed?
7. How did multi-cellular life originate?
8. How did sex originate?
9. Why are the (expected) countless millions of transitional fossils missing?
10. How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years?
11. How did blind chemistry create mind/intelligence, meaning, altruism and morality?
12. Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ story-telling tolerated as ‘science’?
13. Where are the scientific breakthroughs due to evolution?
14. Why is evolution, a theory about history, taught as if it is the same as the operational science?
15. Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes?